A data analytics partner for FIs focused on growth

Helping you grow your bank or credit union with a data analytics program that’s both usable and profitable.

The partner credit unions and community banks trust to reach their objectives.

“Gemineye proves to be an invaluable partner, wholeheartedly dedicated to aiding us in realizing our data analytics objectives.”

–  Clint Johnson, VP of Data & Analytics at P1FCU

“Gemineye distinguished themselves through a highly collaborative approach, demonstrating the mindset of a strategic partner rather than a traditional vendor.

–  Sameer Barua, Director of Data Analytics at DFCU

“The true value of Gemineye is that y’all have lived up to the promise of being our analytics partner and not just another vendor.”

–  Chris Clifford, Data Analyst at Mobility CU

Who is Gemineye?

Gemineye provides data analytics solutions to credit unions and community banks across the country. We believe that regardless of whether you’re a $200M credit union or a $25B bank, you should have access to a data solution that works the way you need it to.

Our signature solution, the Gemineye Data Lakehouse, is the leading industry choice for organizations looking for customization and ownership of their data journey hefty price tag or lengthy timeline. How? By using the same world-class tools that Fortune 50 companies enjoy – Databricks and PowerBI.

We believe the key to success in a data program comes from a partner relationshop with our clients. Our personalized approach to each engagement and comlimentary EaaS ensurethat your specific needs and goals are captured for maximum results.

Our History

Founded
2013
Dedicated to
Financial Institutions
2015
Data Warehouse
Released
2018
Lakehouse
Released
2020
Rebranded
to Gemineye
2023
GemAI
is released
2024
Team continues
to grow
2025

Our Values

You should own your data journey

Your data program shouldn’t be confined to a tiny dark can. We believe that credit unions and community banks deserve to own their data and their data journey. We believe that a practical and usable data program is the key to success. We believe that every financial institution – no matter their size – deserves access to the world-class technology Fortune 50 companies use.

At Gemineye, we take a different approach to data analytics, one that puts our clients back in the driver’s seat of their own data journey. Your data, your definitions, your decision.

persistent

Our Values

A persistent data partner

Innovators at heart, our persistence in problem-solving has made us the clear choice for financial institutions who won’t settle for second best. We pride ourselves on our ability to brainstorm, research, and carve out solutions to tough problems.

Our Values

The very best data team

The Gemineye team consists of data and technology experts with decades of credit union and banking experience, data warehousing design, SQL and ETL development, and API development.

Combined, we create a supergroup of skilled experts with modern sensibilities in the data space. Count on us to provide honest answers, recognize industry-centric trends, and act as a dependable partner in your journey.

Multiple tech logos on white background
mint green triangle

News and Resources

The 2026 AI Sentiment Report

Examining the Correlation Between AI Usage and AI Sentiment in Community Financial Institutions In May and June of 2026, Gemineye conducted primary source research on AI, with the goal of examining the correlation between AI usage and AI sentiment among credit unions and community banks. 30 credit union and community bank employees from almost every business unit were surveyed, whose responses were contrasted with AI research from global leaders Gartner and Qualtrics. The results were eye-opening. A disconnect between the executive push for AI and the organizational capability to do so became clear. And your overall feelings on AI were quite surprising. What You’ll Learn from This Report How financial institutions are currently using AI The disconnect between the executive push for AI and the organizational capability to do so How community FI employees like you feel about AI in Q2 2026 High risk vs low risk AI models Why This Guide Matters for Credit Unions and Community Banks This report will help you understand where your financial institution sits within AI usage and sentiment as compared to your peers, including fascinating results from many departments.

semantic models for credit unions

[Video]: Semantic Models 101 for Community FIs

Let’s talk semantic models for community financial institutions. There’s a lot of misconceptions about them. In this video, we discuss the basics of semantic models, break down myths, and share the facts on what you need to know to make an informed analytics decision for your team without getting persuaded by chatter. Exploring Common Semantic Model Questions Fielded from Credit Unions and Community Banks Gemineye’s COO Matt Jefferson and Director of Business Development Maggie Chopp answer: Whether centralized analytics teams are better than departmental analysts Why unified semantic models ensure consistency If there should ever be a cap on how many fields your semantic model should have Why the misconception of limiting number of fields is holding back your analytics potential How credit unions are successfully integrating data from multiple sources without complexity  Full Transcript Alicia Disantis: Are centralized analytics teams better than departmental analysts? And Matt I will ask you that question. Matt Jefferson: I think centralized analytics teams there, they’re great for consistency and governance. Department analysts are great for kind of speed and the business contacts. I think the real win, no matter what you do in an organization, is when you really have them working with the same semantic model, the same governance principles. You know, I think at some level, you always end up with some level of decentralized, analytics. Maggie Chopp: We’ve seen a couple kind of creative configurations this year, and there’s nothing saying that they can’t work. Well, again, given the, the base semantic model like Matt mentioned, that’s kind of the key to making it all flow. But we have a number of credit unions we’ve talked to this year who have very interesting designs that work for their teams, depending on who rolls up to who. But it works nicely again, with the base model. We have a credit union that as an example that brought in data from their collections platform. A lot of that would never, ever hit the core. But it brought them a lot of value when it came to their repossessions. They ended up making a lot more money knowing which of their resellers were getting them the most margin. And again, that’s not something you’re going to find in a core provider. You’d really need a data warehouse to assess something like that. Alicia Disantis: Should there ever be a cap on how many fields your semantic model should have? Matt Jefferson: No, there should be an artificial cap. Right? Business questions evolve. You know, I always say that every financial institution is like a fingerprint, right? You know, it’s a financial institution, but it is a little bit different. Right? And the right solution, the technology solution, everything makes it very easy to adapt to your your business needs, right, to add the things you need. Do you really want to wait for someone to say like, hey, all of our clients need that particular data field before you can access it? Maggie Chopp: I’m gonna add a little caveat, which is it’s not always good to bring everything. And we want to, you know, optimize for efficiency. We want it to run quickly. Run well. But just from speaking from experience, the credit you and I worked at and all the credit runs we talked to, everybody needs something else. Like every single day. The models are great. We just need to add one more thing. And one thing that we’ve observed is that, some providers will make it really difficult to do that. You’ll have to go way back in time. There’s, a statement of work to draw up. There’s all this kind of finagling just to get one additional data field, which really, it shouldn’t be that complicated. We have a bring it all approach. And so bringing something like a single data field in is it is easy and it should be easy. And if it’s ever not, you should reassess how you’re doing it. And on top of that you know, the concept of even having placeholder fields is somewhat meaningful. We found pretty regularly talking to credit unions. They might all have a different definition of something. But if we keep placeholders in the code for different persona types or different segmentations that are credit unions already use, we don’t even have to go about adding a field, so to speak. We’re just using that credit unions logic. So no, we should never be limiting how many fields should be in a semantic model. Want More Data Analytics best practices? Check out our Data Teams page.

What to Do When Your Data Outgrows Excel

What to Do When Your Data Outgrows Excel

Microsoft Excel is where almost every financial institution’s data work begins. It is familiar, flexible, and already on every desktop. For years, it does the job. The monthly board report comes out of a spreadsheet. The branch numbers live in a spreadsheet. The incentive calculations, the loan summaries, the customer counts, all spreadsheets. And then, at some point, it stops working as well as it used to. The shift is rarely a single dramatic failure. It is a slow accumulation of friction: reports take longer, files get bigger and slower, one person becomes the only one who understands the master workbook, and small errors start having larger consequences. If that pattern feels familiar, your institution may have outgrown Excel without anyone formally deciding it was time to move on. The Signs Your Institution Has Outgrown Spreadsheets Outgrowing Excel looks different at every institution, but the warning signs are consistent. Reports that used to take an hour now take a day, because the data has to be pulled from more places and stitched together by hand. The same numbers do not match across departments, because everyone maintains their own version. A single analyst has become the keeper of a workbook so complex that nobody else can safely touch it, which means the institution has a key-person risk hiding inside a spreadsheet. In many cases it is not even an analyst doing the work but an executive, and a Chief Lending Officer who spends fourteen hours a month wrestling data inside a spreadsheet is fourteen executive-level hours not spent on strategy, lending growth, or leadership. Other signs are subtler. Decisions wait on data that is always a few weeks old by the time it is compiled. Nobody fully trusts the numbers, so meetings get spent debating whose figures are right instead of what to do about them. These are not signs of a team doing poor work. They are signs that the tool has reached the limit of what it was designed to do. Why Spreadsheets Become a Liability at Scale The core problem with relying on spreadsheets for institutional reporting is that they were never built for it. They were built for individual analysis, and they carry risks that grow as the stakes rise. Decades of academic research have reached a consistent conclusion: errors in operational spreadsheets are both common and serious, and they often go undetected until they have already affected a decision. When a spreadsheet drives a board report or a regulatory filing, an undetected error is not a small inconvenience. It is a real financial and compliance risk. Beyond errors, spreadsheets do not scale with the complexity of a modern financial institution. They cannot easily combine data from the core system, digital banking, loan origination, and third-party sources in a way that stays current. They have no built-in governance, so definitions drift and versions multiply. And they depend entirely on the people who build them, which means institutional knowledge walks out the door when those people leave. What was an asset at a small scale becomes a liability at an institutional one. What to Move Toward When Excel Is No Longer Enough Recognizing that you have outgrown Excel is the first step. The harder question for most executives is what to move toward, especially when the team has no appetite for a massive, disruptive technology project. The goal is not to abandon the kind of analysis the team does today. It is to give that analysis a stronger foundation. That foundation is a data platform that brings all the institution’s sources together automatically, maintains consistent and governed definitions, and delivers reporting that stays current without manual assembly. Instead of an analyst pulling exports and reconciling them by hand each month, the data flows in continuously and the reports update on their own. Instead of every department keeping its own version of the truth, everyone works from the same governed source. The analytical thinking the team already does remains. What changes is that the underlying work of gathering, cleaning, and reconciling data stops consuming all their time. Making the Transition Without Disruption The fear that keeps many credit unions on spreadsheets long after they have outgrown them is the fear of the transition itself. Leaders imagine a multi-year implementation, a steep learning curve, and a long period where nothing works. That fear is understandable, but it is based on an outdated picture of what moving to a modern data platform involves. The right platform is designed to integrate with the systems a credit union already runs, rather than requiring them to be replaced. Implementation is measured in weeks, not years. And because the goal is to make data easier to access, not harder, a well-designed platform reduces the learning curve rather than adding to it. The transition is not a leap into the unknown. It is a step onto firmer ground. Move Beyond Spreadsheets With Gemineye Gemineye’s Operations solution is built for credit unions and community banks that have outgrown spreadsheet-based reporting. Instead of waiting until month-end and assembling reports by hand, teams get detailed daily reporting from data that updates automatically. Manual work like branch incentive calculations, which can consume hundreds of hours a year in a spreadsheet, can be automated entirely. Because the platform unifies more than 75 data sources across core systems, digital banking, originations, and third-party vendors with consistent, governed definitions, your institution finally has one trustworthy source instead of a sprawl of workbooks. Implementation is measured in weeks, not years. If your data has outgrown Excel, see how Gemineye’s Operations solution gives your team a foundation built to scale with you.

Showing Slide 1 of 4